In Your Opinion, Why Have Economic Explanations Been So Strongly And Persistently Put Forward To Explain The Scramble For Colonies In Africa In The Late 19th C?

Economic explanations use up been so strongly and persistently prescribe forward to explain the demoralise for colonies in Africa in the of late 19th because it probable is the around reasonable and most possible rationale that can be presented to the world . withal , the real explanation for the scramble for Africa remains a thing of moot for many historiansThere is , of course , some truth to the song that the scramble for Africa was for economic reasons . The economy of the various over-embellished nations was sure as shooting un coupleed concern , because Africa offered lots potential for enriching the colonizing countries . Securing a slur in Africa meant that that trade routes could be maintained . Investments were as well as to a greater extent paying in Africa because of the cheap labor , the limited argui ng , and the abundance of raw materialsControl of Africa was of significant strategic value in ensuring afield trade , especially because of the rivalry between the olympian nations .

Britain , particularly , was under pressure to ensure that lucrative abroad markets were secured . entirely economy was not the only reason , although it whitethorn have been the most compelling , as Africa supplied raw materials much(prenominal) as metals , wood , etc , but not at a really significant level . The colonies turned out to be overpriced to maintain and defendNational prestige was also probably a cock-a-hoop facto r in the scramble There was also much pressu! re to grab a piece of Africa , which was adept postponement to be claimed . An anxious sense of competition among the rival imperial nations also possible played a office staff in the scramble for their place in the sun...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper