Does the nuclear family benefit the bourgoisie?

The nuclear family can be taken to be two p bents and their children. Is the nuclear family primarily to benefit the correctly rather than hostelry as a whole can be perceived to be accepted. This point of view is associated with Marxism and the powerful are the ruling sort off or bourgeoisie. They own the means of production such as land, factories, machines and so on. Marxism is found on an exploitative and unequal proportionship amongst two classes. The proletariats who are the workers are the volume and this is were the family comes in.The family is controlled by those who control the economy and they control the family and curb the family into benefiting them. In whatever hunting lodge the economic aspect (that is, the productive exercise involving the creation of goods and services for distribution and exchange) is always the most basic, fundamental and at long last most significant aspect because it is only through economic action at law that people can produce the things they need for their physical survival.Marxists tend to guarantee triggers like the family in terms of what they do to plump for the overall twist of capitalist inn, their function within the limit of a routineicular degree of economic production. Unlike Functionalist sociology, Conflict sociology tends to view these functions from more than one rake (for example, the family as an institution may serve useful dissolves for upper class men, but not for working class women). Eli Zaretsky ( upper-case letterism, the Family and Personal Life, 1976) a Marxists means that the family is a prop to the capitalist society.The capitalist system is based upon the domestic help labour of housewives who reproduce future generations of workers. He in addition believes that family has become a brisk unit of consumption. The family consumes the products of capitalism and this allows the bourgeoisie to continue producing surplus value. In this respect, people are not simply be ing socialised into society, the acculturation process is directed towards the integration of people into a particular form of social affinity, one that reflects the fundamental, structural, inequalities of Capitalism.The ruling class ideology provokes the family as an institution help to maintain and reproduce basic social inequalities by presenting them as normal and natural within the socialisation process. This creates a wrong class consciousness as they are not aware of their true identity as exploited workers. The family is a synthetic rubber valve for peoples frustrations whereas the vast majority of males are congenatorly powerless in Capitalist industry, the family body structure serves the purpose of disguising this powerless condition.Males within the family grow traditionally been powerful figures in coincidence the females. Marxists contend that this illusion of power within the family serves as a safety value for the build-up of tension and frustration at wor k. The feminist perspective on the family has tended to stress the following ideas. Men oppress women within the family, just as they oppress women within all other institutions in Capitalist society. womens rightist have tended to dismiss ides of gender differences based upon supposed biological / genic differences between males and females that serve to legitimate male domination over women. Women have a role forced upon them within the family. Women act as gratuitous servants within the home. This idea is linked, by Marxist feminists, to the economic relationship between Capital and labour, in the sense that labour is exploited by Capital in the economic aspect just as women are exploited by men within the family. They see family benefiting the powerful who are the men, this is patriarchy.Functionalist sociology has tended to emotional state towards the family as the cornerstone of social integration in any society by which is meant the idea that ways have to be found to make people feel that they belong to the society into which they were born to feel and believe that they have something in common with the people around them. The family group represents the base(a) institution, in any society, for the initial socialisation of children. In this respect, any institution charged with this responsibility is going to play a significant part in the reproduction of cultural norms and values, therefore family benefits society as a whole.The family as a unit of stability, of equal importance to this socialisation function, the family also represents an institution that acts as a stabilising force in society. In this respect, the family is seen to be an institution that is charged with ensuring the maintenance of social order. The basic relationship of the family institution to the whole social structure in society that is proposed by Functionalists is the family is a vital social institution responsible with the basic functions of socialisation and system ma intenance.Fletcher a functionalist thinker, identifies the main functions of the family as being Procreation and Child-Rearing The family structure provides a legitimate arena for the bearing and raising of children. Given the relative helplessness of children at birth, parental nurture and care is seen as vital and the family provides a solid basis for such care and support in the early years of a childs social development. Regulation of Sexual deportmentIn this respect, the family structure serves to limit and contain sexual jealousies and by shaping the limits of sexual freedom, the family structure limits the chances of potentially damaging sexual relationships developing. Additionally, the family is a primary institution for the provision of love, care and emotional support for both children and adults. In short, it provides a sense of belonging and serves to clearly-define role relationships between men and women. preparation of a HomeThis idea expresses the assumption that people find reliever and security within primary social and sexual relationships. The home not only provides physical shelter, it also serves as the focal point of family existence. I recognise that the family group serves some kind of purpose in any society. Where Marxists tend to disagree with thinkers working in other perspectives, however, is in relation to the nature of that purpose and, for Marxists, the relationship between the family and the social structure of any society is one of unequal dependence.Functionalists argue that social institutions develop out of the need to satisfy, fulfil and organise various human social needs. hitherto I feel that the primary role of the family is not to benefit the powerful but in some societies it does to an extent conform to this idea. There are other functions of the family such as the socialisation of children also providing love and support for its members which does not always benefit the powerful.